Discovering The Difference Trademark VS Logo Patents

By Peter Phillips


Whether creating a new product, providing a service or opening a store, it is important to do so in compliance with government regulations. For example, it is important to know the difference as related to a trademark vs logo when applying for a patent. The first thing to understand about the difference is that while a trademark needs to be registered with federal and state agencies, logos do not.

While company names and slogans can be used as trademarks, others prefer to use designs and symbols. In all cases, the design needs to be dedicated to the product or service it projects. For, it identifies the owner as well as the product or service which it projects.

A logo can also qualify as a trademark when meeting certain requirements. In order to qualify, the symbol must be a distinct mark used to distinguish and identify the products or services being offered in the marketplace. Some good examples of this would be the McDonald's Arches, Ronald McDonald, Jack In The Box Clown and Taco Bell.

Once a symbol has been used in the marketplace, the company and owner automatically have the same basic rights with regards to the logo as a trademark. At the same time, there can be times when ownership can come into question. In these situations, it is often advised that companies attempt to work together before filing a civil lawsuit.

Most notably, a company does not need to register a symbol on the federal or state level. For, the State registration of the trademark provides a public record with the general information related to the use of the identifier within the region. As such, when registering a trademark which is the same as a company logo, companies obtain the rights to ownership of the symbol.

When registered, the owner has the right to the presumption of legal ownership, the right to profit, copy, produce and use the symbol and take others to court when questioning ownership. If and when this occurs, it is important for companies to attempt to come to an agreement outside of court. For, there are many cases in which one company or the other simply was not aware that a symbol or trademark was already in use.

In situations where two companies are using the same identifier, a dispute often occurs. If the symbol is not registered, the first company having used the symbol qualifies as the owner. Whereas, if a symbol is registered, then the courts often recognize the owner as being the one who first registered. Ultimately, the companies must follow the decision of the court, though there have been some appeals with regards to these kind of cases.

In situations where an owner had used a logo prior to another company having registered the symbol, then the company might be able to show this earlier use as a means toward ownership. While this is the case, there must often be a state registration with a date which is earlier than that of the other company. In either case, companies can often save a great deal of time and money by working out an agreement.




About the Author: